Way Too Early Recruit Ranks: Boys High School Class of 2023


Click on right here for our Means Too Early Recruit Ranks: Women Excessive Faculty Class of 2023

We proceed our conventional spring recruiting protection with our “Means Too Early” ranks of the present highschool sophomore class. As high recruits proceed to present verbal commitments earlier and earlier, we’re transferring up our rankings to assist in giving higher context to huge recruiting bulletins.

Earlier than we run over our conventional rating methodology, we must always head off a couple of counterarguments on the move:

  • Isn’t this too early to have an excellent learn on expertise? Aren’t 16-year-old children nonetheless bettering? Perhaps. Then again, coaches are clearly discovering roster spots for youths who verbally commit this early. And if we and our readership wish to have probably the most correct image of how the recruiting season is taking part in out, it’ll be helpful to have some type of rating – even one nonetheless very a lot in flux – to consult with as big-name swimmers commit.
  • However recruiting ranks don’t matter. It’s the fast-dropping swimmers and diamonds within the tough that basically have the largest NCAA influence. Not true. There are at all times fast-rising swimmers who rapidly become NCAA stars. However there are far much less of them than there are elite highschool prospects that turn out to be high-impact NCAA swimmers. All of us love the Cinderella tales, the unranked recruits who flourish into dominators. However even these rags-to-riches tales aren’t as fleshed out in the event that they don’t have a clearly-defined setup. These ranks assist present us who’s most probably to turn out to be NCAA standouts… but additionally contextualize the place the eventual breakout stars initially rated in comparison with friends. In the event you, your favourite swimmer or your son/daughter isn’t ranked, don’t get mad – see it as the place to begin in your/their rise to stardom.
  • How correct can these be with two-plus years of improvement to go earlier than any of those swimmers compete within the NCAA? Who is aware of? Predicting the long run by no means has a 100% hit price. For these ranks, we’re rather less involved with precise NCAA scoring instances than we’re in our junior/senior ranks, and possibly marginally extra serious about “ceilings” – large occasion ranges, versatility, and so forth. However as with every rating, these are in the end nothing greater than a snapshot in time: what the highest of this recruiting class seems like within the second, with full admission that a number of these ranks can and can change by the point they end their senior years.


Our aim in these rankings is to replicate what school coaches search for in recruits, based mostly on a few years of conversations and protection.

We focus solely on American-based athletes, just because there’s a lot uncertainty with worldwide recruits – in the event that they’ll come to the USA, after they’ll come to the States and with what graduating class they need to be ranked. Projecting worldwide recruits typically turns into extra of a dialogue of when they’ll first be part of a university program and never which program they’ll be part of.

A couple of different elements that weigh closely in our rankings:

  • Relay Worth – Relay factors rely double in school swimming, and any program wants a robust secure of high quality sprinters to fill out all 5 relays with stars. Clearly, a particular distance swimmer can simply rank forward of an excellent 100 freestyler, however school swimming usually values a dash freestyler over a distance swimmer, all different elements being equal.
  • Enhancements – Precise instances carry probably the most weight by a longshot. However we additionally regulate a swimmer’s trajectory, particularly in deciding between two swimmers with comparatively even instances.
  • Brief Course over Lengthy Course – whereas each membership and each swimmer may have a unique steadiness of focus between brief course and lengthy course swimming, the NCAA competes in brief course yards, and that’s going to be the principle issue thought of in these rankings. Lengthy course instances are one other information level for consideration, however we primarily view them by the lens of what a giant lengthy course swim may imply for an athlete’s future in brief course.
  • NCAA scoring capacity – NCAAs are the large present for school groups, so we’ve weighted NCAA scoring potential very extremely. Swimmers who have already got NCAA scoring instances wind up largely filling out the highest our of rankings. Since school athletic administrators – and by extension coaches – additionally place excessive worth on convention championships, scoring capacity at convention meets can be a consider our rankings.
  • Relative depth within the NCAA and recruiting class – a wealth of elite depth nationwide in a single stroke self-discipline makes a giant distinction in what instances are thought of extra useful in that occasion. Occasions rise at completely different charges within the NCAA, however when one occasion will get extraordinarily deep and quick on the school degree, it makes highschool prospects in these occasions rather less useful, comparatively, with a lot of different veteran choices. In the identical means, a recruiting class stacked with swimmers in butterfly, for instance, would make every butterflyer rather less sought-after available in the market, with a lot of different recruiting choices in a position to present related manufacturing.

In fact, there’s no technique to predict the long run, and probably the most concrete information we’ve got to go on are chilly, exhausting instances. These rankings under no circumstances imply that every one of those 20 swimmers can be NCAA standouts, they usually definitely don’t imply that no swimmer left off this checklist will make huge contributions on the NCAA degree.


  • Deep dash class – might be a game-changer for relays
  • Additionally deep in fly/again, however largely nonetheless in improvement
  • Skinny IM & breaststroke teams
  • Large dropoff after high few 200/500 guys

As with most sophomore courses, this group could be very a lot nonetheless in improvement. And a yr of inconsistent coaching and racing alternatives solely makes projecting particular person athletes that a lot trickier.

On the flip aspect, we will make some bigger-picture observations of this class, whilst we absolutely anticipate the highest 20 to bear a fairly dramatic shift so as by subsequent yr. (That’s what we noticed with final yr’s sophomores, too).

There’s no clear-cut #1 sprinter on this class, however as an entire, sprinters is likely to be the energy of this class. There’s an excellent variety of 20-point/44-point kind guys, and a deep group simply outdoors of our high 20 within the 21./45./1:39. vary. The sprints often reward measurement and energy, and we often anticipate to see extra enhancements as swimmers transfer from highschool sophomores in direction of school freshmen. So with this group being as deep as it’s, the NCAA might be getting an all-around relay infusion, if the development curves hit for many of those guys.

The butterfly and backstroke teams are additionally fairly deep. They’ve received a bit extra definition on the high, with a couple of 46/47 varieties, after which a giant dropoff to the excessive 48s and 49s. There aren’t a ton of two-distance standouts in both fly or again but, however that’s one thing that most likely comes together with extra racing alternatives.

General, it’s a really skinny IM group. The highest time within the class is best in each IMs than final yr’s sophomores, however the depth actually drops off, and the IMs aren’t on the ranges of the courses of 2021 or 2020 as sophomores. Breaststroke can be comparatively skinny, although there’s an honest quantity of 54-second guys engaged on creating 200 pace.

When you get past the highest 10 or so, there’s a giant dropoff within the 200/500 frees, too, so the highest few swimmers in these occasions can be particularly useful in the intervening time.

**The 1000 free isn’t an occasion on the Division I NCAA Championships, however is swum as a substitute of the 1650 in lots of Division I twin meets and is a part of the NCAA program in Division II.

With that out of the way in which, let’s get to our rankings.

Disclaimer: there are a lot of highschool sophomores within the nation, and no actually good, full, 100% correct itemizing of all of them. In the event you don’t see your favourite swimmer on the checklist, be at liberty to politely level them out within the feedback. There’s an opportunity that we disagree together with your evaluation of their spot within the high 20, and as long as it’s carried out civilly, there’s no downside with variations of opinions. There’s additionally an opportunity that we’ve merely missed a no brainer (we’ve taken each precaution to keep away from that), and if that occurs, we wish to be sure we right it.


1. Will Modglin – Zionsville Swim Membership – Zionsville Neighborhood Excessive Faculty – Zionsville, IN
Finest Occasions: 200 IM – 1:45.14, 100 again – 46.60, 100 free – 43.82, 100 fly – 47.56, 50 free – 20.13, 200 free – 1:37.54, 200 again – 1:45.24

Modglin must be a really useful NCAA swimmer, with glorious dash pace throughout all 4 strokes. He’s the very best within the class within the 100 again, 100 free, and 200 IM, with loads of different occasions to develop over the remainder of his highschool profession. Modglin is nearly a second sooner than some other backstroker on this class, and is the one freestyler beneath 44. One early comparability for Modglin: Destin Lasco, who was the #1 swimmer in his sophomore class within the 100 free (43.6) and 100 again (45.9) again in 2018. Hold an eye fixed out for Modglin at subsequent week’s Wave II Olympic Trials, the place he’ll attempt to enhance lengthy course bests of 54.1 in fly, 55.0 in again and a couple of:03.1 in IM.

2. Rex Maurer – Rose Bowl Aquatics – Loyola Excessive Faculty – Pasadena, CA
Finest Occasions: 500 free – 4:19.57, 200 free – 1:35.91, 100 free – 44.40, 50 free – 20.93, 1000 free – 9:33.55, 1650 free – 15:23.91

We talked about the steep dropoff within the 200/500 free – effectively, Maurer is the highest of the category, with a steep cliff behind him. 4:19 within the 500 is much better than the very best time in final yr’s sophomore ranks (Morrissey’s 4:24.1) or the yr earlier than that (Frandson’s 4:23.1), although it’s not fairly in step with Jake Magahey’s 4:16.8 from the category of 2020. In the identical vein, Maurer’s 200 free is the very best sophomore time we’ve ranked since Carson Foster (1:33.7) in that class of 2020. Maurer additionally has nice vary right down to the 50 free and as much as the 1650, so it’s price maintaining a tally of which finish of that vary he develops most over the subsequent two years.

3. Nate Germonprez – Encourage Swim Staff – Westside Excessive Faculty – Omaha, NE
Finest Occasions: 200 IM – 1:45.41, 200 free – 1:36.16, 100 free – 44.73, 50 free – 20.83, 100 again – 47.72, 200 again – 1:45.14, 100 breast – 54.52, 200 breast – 2:00.43, 400 IM – 3:56.01

Germonprez most likely simply jumped onto a number of followers’ radars with some excellent lengthy course swims at Wave I Olympic Trials. (2:02.5 within the lengthy course 200 IM is most spectacular, and truly six-tenths of a second sooner than Modglin’s lengthy course greatest, although Modglin will compete subsequent week). Germonprez has no class-best instances in brief course, however is simply 0.3 seconds away within the 200 IM and 0.1 seconds away within the 200 free. He’s very spectacular by the 100s of all 4 strokes, with nice vary as much as the 200, and will very simply bounce to #1 on this class with a couple of reasonable time drops.

4. Scotty Buff – Better Toledo Aquatic Membership – Saint Francis de Gross sales Excessive Faculty – Maumee, OH
Finest Occasions: 100 fly – 46.59, 100 again – 47.48, 50 free – 20.24, 200 again – 1:48.61

The highest 4 on this class appear to be in their very own tier in the intervening time. Buff is the very best 100 flyer within the class – actually, his fly pace matches up favorably in comparison with earlier high sophomore recruits Aidan Hayes (46.6) and Luca Urlando (46.9). Buff is way more of a flexible sprinter proper now than a two-distance butterflyer, although we’ve seen loads of swimmers make huge strides within the daunting 200 fly as they become older – simply have a look at Hayes, who went from 1:47.0 as a sophomore to 1:41 as a junior. Buff can be 54.6 within the lengthy course 100 fly.

5. Keaton Jones – Swim Neptune – Higley Excessive Faculty – Gilbert, AZ
Finest Occasions: 200 again – 1:42.81, 500 free – 4:22.66, 200 free – 1:38.00, 400 IM – 3:51.97, 100 again – 48.67, 1000 free – 9:18.11, 1650 free – 15:22.83, 100 free – 45.32, 50 free – 20.70

Jones is the very best 200 backstroker within the class, and it’s not shut. 1:42.8 is only a second off what it took to earn an NCAA invite in 2021 and inside two seconds of an NCAA scoring time. Jones has glorious versatility, a lot in order that it’s not completely clear but if backstroke must be his principal occasion. We are likely to see huge 500 free drops late in highschool and early in school, so 4:22 within the 500 carries extra weight that it seems to. Jones can be 3:51.9 within the 400 IM, and based mostly on his lengthy course pace (4:24.8) and the truth that his brief course greatest comes from pre-pandemic, he is likely to be in line to drop in that occasion and problem the very best IMers within the class. Jones will even compete at Wave II Trials subsequent week.

6. Mitchell Ledford – Treasure Coast Swimming – Sebastian River Excessive Faculty – Sebastian, FL
Finest Occasions: 100 fly – 46.96, 200 fly – 1:46.32, 100 free – 45.37, 200 free – 1:40.54, 200 IM – 1:50.06

Ledford is the very best two-distance flyer within the class proper now. He’s inside about half a second of Buff’s class-leading 100 fly, and has the very best 200 fly within the subject besides. He’s an excellent lengthy course swimmer, with instances of 53.5 and a couple of:01.9 in butterfly. (For what it’s price, that 100 is best than Buff’s greatest lengthy course time). Ledford can be fairly strong within the relay-distance freestyles (21.1/45.3/1:40.5) and will develop right into a multi-relay menace down the street.

7. Andrew Taylor – Tampa Bay Aquatic Membership – Countryside Excessive Faculty – Palm Harbor, FL
Finest Occasions: 1650 free – 15:13.87, 1000 free – 9:05.00, 500 free – 4:22.23, 400 IM – 3:51.51, 200 free – 1:40.58

Our high distance swimmer, Taylor is barely about 12 seconds off of NCAA invite vary within the mile. He’s additionally a really strong 500 freestyler, and has a clear-cut NCAA occasion trio with the 1650 free, 500 free, and 400 IM. Taylor hit a bunch of his lifetime-best instances this spring, and seems to be swimming effectively popping out of the pandemic.

8. Jonny Marshall – Firestone Akron Swim Staff – Firestone Senior Excessive Faculty – Akron, OH
Finest Occasions: 100 again – 47.41, 200 again – 1:47.15, 200 free – 1:38.83, 100 free – 45.55

Marshall is a strong backstroker who developments a bit extra in direction of the sprints. In comparison with Keaton Jones above, Marshall is greater than a second sooner within the 100, however about 4 seconds slower within the 200. A promising signal for his creating endurance, although, is that Marshall is already 1:38.8 within the 200 free, not removed from Jones’ greatest there. marshall is 56.2 in lengthy course again, and provides a 56.9 lengthy course 100 fly to the combination – search for his 200 again and/or 100 fly (49.7 proper now) to make strides over his junior yr.

9. Roman Jones – Jersey Flyers Aquatic Membership – The Pingry Faculty – Chatham, NJ
Finest Occasions: 100 fly – 47.70, 100 again – 48.11, 100 free – 44.87, 200 free – 1:38.87, 50 free – 20.57

Jones tasks as a superb 100-specialist. He’s received excellent pace by fly, again and free. 47.7 places him a tick behind the highest dash flyers within the class, and 48.1 is on the cusp of becoming a member of the highest group of 100 backstrokers, too. His lengthy course 100 fly time (54.6) is a good signal for his improvement within the 100-/200-yard fly races. Jones has good pace into the relay-distance freestyles, too.

10. Will Heck – Bolles Faculty Sharks – Bolles Faculty – Jacksonville, FL
Finest Occasions: 100 breast – 53.73, 200 breast – 1:57.16, 200 IM – 1:49.27

Heck is the very best breaststroker within the class, and his 100 time stacks up fairly effectively in comparison with earlier sophomore class leaders like Hank Rivers (53.9 within the class of ’22) and Ethan Dang (53.6 within the class of ’20). This class as an entire wants some enhancements within the 200 breast, however Heck is ranging from the quickest 200 time of anyone on this class. He’s additionally received an excellent 200 IM and a sub-50 within the 100 fly that provide strong tertiary NCAA occasions.

11. Simon Lins – Piedmont Swim Staff – Oakland, CA
Finest Occasions: 50 free – 20.11, 100 free – 44.85, 100 fly – 48.99, 200 free – 1:40.65

Lins is the very best dash freestyler on this class, however he’s received an enormous crowd proper on his tail. Whoever emerges from that group will most likely surge means up into our high 10 as juniors. Lins is correct on the cusp of being sub-20 within the 50 free, and brings fairly good 100 pace with it in each free (44.8) and fly (48.9). Lins made large drops from 21.0/46.7 in dash free and 50.5 in fly at a March meet, so the development curve is great.

12. Hayden Bellotti – First Colony Swim Staff – Clements Excessive Faculty – Sugar Land, TX
Finest Occasions: 200 free – 1:37.44, 100 free – 44.05, 50 free – 20.75, 100 fly – 49.25, 200 fly – 1:49.34, 100 again – 49.37, 500 free – 4:27.99

Bellotti is one other robust contender for this class’s greatest relay-distance freestyler. He doesn’t have the identical jets as Lins over the short-range, however he’s fairly a bit higher as much as the 100 and 200 of freestyle. On the flip aspect, he’s a step behind Lins within the 100 fly at this level, however then brings a bit extra versatility as much as the 200 fly, 500 free, and into the backstroke.

13. Josh Guardian – Bluefish Swim Membership – Wilbraham, MA
Finest Occasions: 1650 free – 15:20.71, 1000 free – 9:10.77, 400 IM – 3:50.36, 200 fly – 1:48.43, 200 IM – 1:49.93, 200 free – 1:39.51, 500 free – 4:28.70

Guardian might be certainly one of these guys we see yearly who’s a greater swimmer than he’s an NCAA prospect. The truth is, he’s certainly one of solely a handful of fellows on this checklist competing in Wave II Olympic Trials this week. Guardian is possibly most fun as a 400 IMer, the place his 3:50.3 is inside placing distance of the very best within the class, however his lengthy course 4:23 places him firmly atop the category. He’s additionally fairly near NCAA invite vary within the mile, and has a lot of alternative to increase his vary down into the 200/500 free or into the 200 IM or 200 fly.

14. Toby Barnett – Rockville Montgomery Swim Membership – Rockville Excessive Faculty – Bethesda, MD
Finest Occasions: 400 IM – 3:49.42, 200 IM – 1:48.53, 200 breast – 1:57.87, 100 breast – 56.35

We’re beginning a run of IMers right here. Barnett truly outdoes Guardian a bit within the brief course 400 IM, and likewise carries higher instances right down to the 200 IM. Barnett may not completely have the flexibility Guardian does but, however between the IMs and the breaststrokes, he’s received lots to work with as an NCAA prospect. It wouldn’t be stunning to see Barnett finally take over as the very best 200 breaststroker on this class, buoying his worth by subsequent yr.

15. Roberto Bonilla Flores – The Woodlands Swim Staff – The Woodlands Excessive Faculty – The Woodlands, TX
Finest Occasions: 400 IM – 3:48.83, 200 fly – 1:46.45, 200 IM – 1:49.94, 100 breast – 55.86, 200 breast – 2:01.33

Flores truly has the very best 400 IM within the class, although solely by about six-tenths over Barnett. Like Barnett, he’s received a fairly strong trio of NCAA occasions that match collectively effectively within the school meet order: the 200 IM, 400 IM, and 200 fly. Flores wants to enhance his pace a bit extra to drop from 1:49.9 within the 200 IM, however he’s received big-time mid-distance expertise, with lengthy course instances of 4:26 within the 400 IM and a couple of:02 within the 200 fly. Flores can be a fairly strong breaststroker who may develop there as effectively.

16. Sonny Wang – Waterloo Swimming – Westwood Excessive Faculty – Austin, TX
Finest Occasions: 50 free – 20.27, 100 free – 44.28, 100 fly – 50.05

Wang could be very similar to Lins – an amazing short-distance sprinter who remains to be making an attempt to develop third occasion. 20.2/44.2 is nice brief pace, and would make Wang a useful relay prospect. However he’ll have to hold bettering to get towards NCAA scoring vary, which could be very quick (19.3/42.4) within the sprints. His 100 fly has potential as a tertiary occasion, and Wang can be a 57.5 breaststroker.

17. Ben Scholl – Cypress Fairbanks Swim Membership – Cypress, TX
Finest Occasions: 50 free – 20.40, 100 free – 44.65, 200 free – 1:39.12

Wang and Scholl might be interchangeable based mostly on how a lot you worth every swimmer’s third occasions. Scholl is only a tick behind Wang in each the 50 and 100 frees, although he’s nonetheless among the many greatest within the class in each occasions. His 1:39.1 within the 200 free most likely carries a bit extra worth than Wang’s 100 fly, however this far out, it’s actually going to come back right down to who has greater time drops over the subsequent two years.

18. Bert Najera – Mission Viejo Nadadores – Santa Margarita Catholic Excessive Faculty – Rancho Santa Margarita, CA
Finest Occasions: 200 IM – 1:47.26, 400 IM – 3:55.72, 500 free – 4:26.19, 1000 free – 9:23.99, 1650 free – 15:49.75

Najera’s received a fairly fascinating occasion combo proper now – his greatest two occasions is likely to be the 200 IM and 500 free, which share a session at NCAAs and aren’t actually a workable combo. However being pretty much as good as he’s at each gives a number of completely different routes to school manufacturing. We are likely to see huge IM drops late in highschool and early in school, so it wouldn’t take a lot of a drop from that 3:55 within the 400 IM to make Najera one of many class’s greatest all-around IMers. Najera can be 1:47.7 within the brief course 200 again and a couple of:02 within the lengthy course 200 fly, exhibiting some rangy versatility.

19. Gibson Holmes – Mason Manta Rays – Indian Hill Excessive Faculty – Cincinnati, OH
Finest Occasions: 100 fly – 47.97, 200 IM – 1:48.20, 400 IM – 3:57.07, 100 breast – 55.35, 100 again – 50.09, 100 free – 45.22, 200 free – 1:39.38

47-second flyers are often fairly useful, particularly amongst highschool sophomores. That’s the clear standout occasion for Holmes, who has been 55.7 in lengthy course fly. He’s additionally received an excellent 200 IM, and like Najera, we’d hold an eye fixed out for giant drops in his 400 IM transferring ahead.

20. Will Scholtz – Lakeside Swim Staff – St. Xavier Excessive Faculty – Prospect, KY
Finest Occasions: 400 IM – 3:53.45, 200 breast – 1:58.32, 100 breast – 54.45, 200 IM – 1:48.57

Scholtz tasks into that 200 IM/400 IM/200 breast kind of NCAA lineup, though he may find yourself being primarily a breaststroker, too. His lengthy course instances would help the breaststroker route: Scholtz went a blistering 2:16.4 within the 200 breast at Wave I Olympic Trials, and added a 1:03.0 within the 100 lengthy course breaststroke earlier this spring.



Paring the checklist down to twenty at all times looks like pulling enamel. This isn’t an exhaustive checklist of others we thought of, however the high few left off the checklist who made the selections on 18-20 very troublesome.

Caleb Maldari – Bluefish Swim Membership – Wellesley, MA
Finest Occasions: 200 again – 1:44.65, 100 again – 48.74, 200 IM – 1:49.29, 400 IM – 3:54.85, 200 free – 1:40.16

Maldari is a good 200 backstroker who may break into the highest 20 if he can convey that 100 down into the 47s. He’s additionally an excellent IMer, and went 55.8 in lengthy course 100 again in Might and a couple of:01.1 in an extended programs 200 again at Wave I Olympic Trials.

Joe Hayburn – Annapolis Swim Membership – Saint Marys Excessive Faculty – Pasadena, MD
Finest Occasions: 200 again – 1:45.81, 100 again – 48.41, 100 fly – 50.41

Hayburn is one other man who has an amazing 200 again, and he’s truly received a bit extra 100 pace than Maldari. Hayburn lower right down to 55.9 within the lengthy course 100 again at Wave I Trials.

Logan Brown – First Colony Swim Staff – Clements Excessive Faculty – Sugar Land, TX
Finest Occasions: 100 breast – 54.74, 200 breast – 1:59.21, 200 IM – 1:49.16, 400 IM – 3:56.73, 100 fly – 49.63, 100 free – 45.76

Brown kicks off an extended checklist of fine breaststrokers who couldn’t fairly match into our high 20 – you’ll see lots extra in our Better of the Relaxation part. Brown is sub-2:00 within the 200 breast, and likewise brings good IM potential.

Hudson Williams – New Albany Aquatic Membership – Olentangy Liberty Excessive Faculty – Powell, OH
Finest Occasions: 200 IM – 1:48.34, 100 again – 49.48, 50 free – 20.91, 100 free – 44.97

It’s a fairly fascinating occasion unfold for Williams. His 1:48 IM might be the headliner, however with some drops in dash freestyle, he may truly surge up our checklist higher as a relay man.

Bobby Dinunzio – Tide Swim Staff – Virginia Seaside, VA
Finest Occasions: 1650 free – 15:23.09, 1000 free – 9:18.31, 500 free – 4:27.86, 200 free – 1:41.43

Within the 500/1000/1650 vary, Dinunzio is a step above the opposite distance freestylers not on this checklist. He’s additionally been 3:59 within the lengthy course 400, which is a strong mark, and he’s received sufficient intrigue within the 200 to finally develop right into a distance swimmer with one relay choice.



Some extra names that got here up in our analysis. For the needs of area, we received’t embrace each high occasion for these athletes, however only a few of their standouts. Verbal commitments are listed the place they’ve been reported. Every of those athletes remains to be a particularly high-level recruit:

  • Dash free:
    • Samuel Quarles (20.8/45.0/1:39.4)
    • Diggory Dillingham (20.2/45.4)
    • Noah Dyer (21.0/45.2/1:38.8, 49.4FL)
    • Josh Noll (45.3/1:39.2, 49.7/1:48.7BK, 49.6FL)
  • Distance free:
    • Zachary Larrick (21.7/45.6/1:37.9/4:28/15:44)
    • Kayden Lancaster (21.5/45.7/1:38.0/4:28/15:43)
    • Henry McFadden (1:38.8/4:25.1/15:51, 1:48.2FL)
    • Isaac Fleig (4:33/9:27/15:29, 3:56IM, 1:49.0FL)
    • Jack Hendrick (1:41/4:28/9:31/15:42)
    • Ethan Wang (1:40.5/4:31/9:31/15:42)
    • Craig Bohlman (1:41/4:31/9:24/15:40)
    • Keller Morgan (1:42/4:29/9:33/15:51, 1:48.6IM)
  • Backstroke:
    • Brendan Whitfield (49.1/1:46.7, 48.9FL)
    • Chase Mueller (49.2/1:46.1)
    • Ben Irwin (49.5/1:46.5)
    • Will Thompson (49.3/1:47.0)
    • Eli Stoll (49.0/1:47.5)
    • Logan Walker (49.0/1:48.5, 49.3FL, 1:39.0/4:31FR)
  • Breaststroke:
    • J.R. Taylor (55.0/2:00.1)
    • Grant Gooding (54.8, 20.8FR)
    • Ethan Schwab (55.4/2:01.0)
    • Avery Henke (54.9, 49.5BK)
  • Butterfly:
    • Diego Nosack (49.2/1:47.1, 3:55IM)
    • Andrew Billitto (48.4/1:49.8, 48.9BK, 45.1/1:38.9FR)
    • Jack Stokvis (48.3)


Feeling nostalgic? Right here’s a glance again at our historic recruiting class rankings, plus our retrospectives of these courses after 4 NCAA seasons:


Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *