Dolphins’ 2021 NFL draft choices at RB: Najee Harris at No. 18 or wait?


MIAMI — Because the second Alabama operating again Najee Harris leaped over a Notre Dame defender en path to a 53-yard run throughout January’s Rose Bowl, Miami Dolphins followers have been dreaming of the 6-foot-2, 232-pound playmaker sporting aqua on Sundays.

There was loads of debate in regards to the Dolphins’ No. 6 decide within the 2021 NFL draft, which is predicted to be a pass-catcher with LSU’s Ja’Marr Chase, Alabama’s DeVonta Smith and Florida’s Kyle Pitts as Miami’s most certainly choices.

However let’s deal with operating backs, which could possibly be a goal for the Dolphins’ different prime picks at No. 18 in addition to two second-round picks (Nos. 36 and 50).

The Dolphins are interested by drafting a function operating again, sources instructed ESPN, with added intrigue in larger, full backs.

Harris, who’s listed by ESPN draft analysts Mel Kiper Jr., Todd McShay and Matt Miller as this draft’s top-rated operating again, was related to Miami when he was a late add to the Dolphins’ Senior Bowl roster. Harris appears prone to be accessible at No. 18, however a lot much less prone to be there at No. 36. The dilemma is whether or not the Dolphins ought to make the leap at No. 18, or see if there’s higher worth in drafting a extra premium place equivalent to pass-rusher with Georgia’s Azeez Ojulari, Miami’s Jaelan Phillips and Michigan’s Kwity Paye among the many prime choices.

We begin by taking a deeper have a look at the draft’s prime choices. ESPN requested 9 soccer analysts who their top-three prospects are so as, and the panel contains Kiper, McShay, Miller, three NFL scouts or personnel executives, a NFL operating again and Working Again Academy draft prep coaches Jerry Seymour Jr. and Torri Harmon.

All 9 listed the identical three names, however in numerous orders — Harris, Clemson’s Travis Etienne, and North Carolina’s Javonte Williams. Past that, there was little consensus on order (see chart for full breakdown).

The outcomes illustrate it’s a pick-your-flavor sort of operating again class, so is Harris, Etienne or Williams well worth the Dolphins’ mid-first spherical decide?

“I do not assume any of those backs are value a first-round decide,” stated the AFC scout, who listed Etienne because the top-rated operating again. He had larger grades on Wisconsin’s Jonathan Taylor and LSU’s Clyde Edwards-Helaire final 12 months than the 2021 class.

Our ESPN draft analysts all chosen Harris as the highest operating again, with Kiper noting, “he is an entire operating again. He is good at every little thing — run, catch, block and he does not fumble.”

Miller stated Harris’ “capability to run with energy is phenomenal at 230 kilos, however the agility, capability to create laterally and make individuals miss contained in the sort out field stands out extra.” Miller additionally talked about Williams “runs extra violently than any again on this class.”

Etienne obtained the very best vote complete amongst our panel, and people who favored him pointed to his superior velocity and explosiveness. The NFC personnel govt frightened how Harris’ lack of lengthy runs would translate to the trendy NFL, and famous Etienne could possibly be efficient in an Alvin Kamara-type of function.

Miami has finished its homework. Dolphins co-offensive coordinator Eric Studesville led Etienne by drills at Clemson’s professional day. Etienne stated he would like to be coached by Studesville. Dolphins normal supervisor Chris Grier and Studesville watched Williams at North Carolina’s professional day. The Dolphins’ employees spent per week with Harris on the Senior Bowl.

If Miami misses out on one of many prime three rushers, a few our evaluators talked about North Carolina’s Michael Carter and Ohio State’s Trey Sermon as main the following tier of operating again prospects. Each have limitations, although Sermon is the higher match when paired in a two-headed backfield with promising receiving again Myles Gaskin. Sermon is probably going a third- or fourth-round decide.

The Dolphins did important analysis final 12 months with the concept of probably choosing a function again, sources stated, however with Taylor, Ohio State’s J.Ok. Dobbins (Ravens) and Florida State’s Cam Akers (Rams) on the board, they drafted developmental cornerback Noah Igbinoghene at No. 30 and proper sort out Robert Hunt at No. 39. All three backs went in Spherical 2.

Taylor went No. 41 to the Indianapolis Colts, then completed third within the NFL in speeding with 1,169 yards and 11 touchdowns. Akers and Dobbins went No. 52 and No. 55, respectively, and each had profitable rookie seasons. Igbinoghene struggled considerably as a backup exterior cornerback and didn’t play a lot after September.

It is too early to present a remaining analysis, however the choice to bypass Taylor seems like an early mistake. The Dolphins can’t afford to make the identical mistake once more.

Final season Miami tried to construct up its backfield piecemeal by signing Jordan Howard to what amounted to a five-game, five-million deal and buying and selling a fifth-round decide for Matt Breida. Each strikes failed, although Gaskin, a 2019 seventh-round decide, had a surprisingly sturdy season (584 yards and three touchdowns).


The Dolphins ought to use one in every of their 4 top-50 picks on Harris, Williams or Etienne to assist second-year quarterback Tua Tagovailoa and full the offense. Harris may be a little bit of a attain at No. 18, however he is well worth the likelihood if the Dolphins love the participant.

In our ballot, there wasn’t an enormous hole separating the gamers, so I would opine that relying on how the draft board falls there may be higher expertise and positional worth at No. 18 for the Dolphins to draft fairly than apply it to Harris there. Miami choosing Williams at No. 36 appears extra like the best answer. Although if Miami is eyeing Williams or any operating again early in Spherical 2, it must presumably commerce forward of the operating back-needy New York Jets (No. 34) and Atlanta Falcons (No. 35).


Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *